Farmed vs. Wild Caught

The Natural Stocks

The FAO reports 31% of the world’s fish stocks are overfished, and 58% are fully exploited. An excess of fishing effort, lack of foresight in management, and demand for particular species puts pressure on the world’s oceans. Seafood that comes from wild-caught stocks often contributes to overfishing. Oppositely, the species that can be successful grown through aquaculture help reduce fishing pressure on the natural stocks while still providing food for a growing population.

In wild caught fisheries, destructive gears such as bottom trawling and long lining often come with the consequences of bycatch. Bycatch includes discarded animals fishermen do not want, cannot sell, or are not allowed to keep; these are the species not being targeted by fishers but that still end up in their catch (NOAA). “According to some estimates, global bycatch may account for 40 percent of the world’s catch, totaling 63 billion pounds per year” (Oceana, 2014). Not only is this devastating to the marine environment, but it is a waste of food as bycatch is typically thrown back to the sea, dead.

Aquaculture Standards

In the U.S., aquaculture seafood is produced in a controlled environment with strict laws and regulations that ensure traceability and health standards for the consumer. In order to declare a product “organic,” it must meet particular guidelines in production. When it comes to seafood, “organic” can only be applied to aquaculture products, and is not a term that can be used for wild caught species, as it is unknown what that animal has encountered before being captured. In some cases, wild populations of fish are exposed to chemicals in the water that then turn up in their tissue.

A controversial topic in aquaculture is the use of antibiotics. It’s important to note that not every fish farm uses antibiotics. An alternative to antibiotics is being tried at a salmon farm in Norway, which keeps just one generation of fish in a single location at a time. The World Health Organization identifies this strategy as being ideal, but “If that’s not possible, farmers periodically empty holding areas for fish, disinfect them and leave them empty for a few months. Such methods help prevent cross-contamination between old and new generations” (WHO, 2015). Others have tried introducing smaller fish to eat pests off the larger fish as a non-antibiotic means of health treatment.

The aquaculture operations that do use antibiotics, however, have proven to have large benefits in fish production by preventing diseases. In the U.S. all antibiotic use in aquaculture is regulated and managed through the US Food and Drug Administration (USDA), which maintains standards for safe levels of consumption.

Learn more about aquaculture regulations here.